TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Re: Orion qsk

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Re: Orion qsk
From: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Reply-to: k2xx@swva.net, tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 10:45:19 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hello, Bob. I know you're using a Titan 425 there or, at least, were. I am also, but I am unhappy with short delay or hang time on CW even with the QSK set to 100%. When you say you have your amps keyed with the PTT, what exactly are you doing? In the meantime, I'll go back and look at the manual to see if I missed something. Also, what delay, if any, are you applying before the amp is keyed?

Thanks for your input.

73, Joe

W9GE wrote:

W9OY asks a valid question.  My very personal opinion, as a die hard dx
hound is no, I have no need for qsk.  As a contest op I have little need for
qsk mainly because I do not ever employ an endless cq loop.  A vast majority
of dxing and contest transmissions are less than five seconds in length. I
leave the Orion qsk menu turned to 80%, so it is very slow.  I do not like
the clacking and I have my amps all keyed with the ptt, so they are turned
on for the duration.  And all three of those amps are qsk capable.

Many many years ago I handled a bit of traffic and was ncs several nights a
week.  I needed, wanted and demanded qsk.  I had the perfect qsk...a
separate rx/tx and separate rx antenna.  One just turned down the rf gain a
bit so the rx was not overloaded. I still have that set up available....it
is called a Johnson Valiant and the Orion receiver.  terrific combo!  Orion
is far superior to the old 2B I used when handling tfc.     Different
strokes.  73 bob de w9ge

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec





_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>