TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Re: Roofing filters

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Re: Roofing filters
From: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:24:32 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
>          Grant, you apparently don't operate in SSB contests.  1.8 kHz spacing
> would truly be a luxury...signals are more like 1-1.5 kHz apart.  I often
> go to 1.5-1.6 kHz bandwidth when the going gets really tough...which is on
> the edge of readability for me.  2-3 kHz???...not in any SSB contests I've
> seen.  

That wasn't what I was saying.  Yes, sure the 1.8 Khz roofing filter is useful 
in 
contests or just 75M at night :-)

Someone said they were going to stick the 1.8 Khz filter it in the 2.4 Khz slot 
(I don't 
think it was you, but might be wrong), and there was a follow-on comment that 
that 
might not work because of transmit signal routing.  

I was thinking "6Khz slot" when I made the comment above (brain on vacation), 
but 
generally my statement really was to say that it doesn't make sense to use a 
narrower roofing filter than DSP bandwidth.

I still sense confusion among some (you not included) about roofing vs. IF 
filtering in 
the flow of the discussion,  however.   And think we're getting bamfoozled to 
some 
extent by the option count :-)

Grant/NQ5T
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>