To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Roofing Filters |
From: | Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:48:15 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I wrote:>1. Measurements by Sherwood have shown that the 1800 is equivalent to the 1000 for IMD at moderate spacings (down to 2-5 khz). Here are Sherwood's IMD measurements for anyone interested: IMD at 20/5/2 kHz: 1.8 KHz filter 96/95/93dB 1.0 KHz filter 96/94/93dB Sources:http://dayton.akorn.net/pipermail/orion/2004-March/000309.html http://dayton.akorn.net/pipermail/orion/2004-March/000310.html ...and of course the following for the 600 Hz: "At 5, 10 and 20 kHz, there is no significant (IMD) difference between the stock 1.0 kHz Ten-Tec filter and the Inrad filter. At 2 kHz spacing, the improvement is on the order of 6 to 7 dB. At 1 kHz spacing the improvement is closer to 10 dB." http://users.vnet.net/btippett/inrad_.htm (private E-mail from Sherwood) 73, Bill W4ZV _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Re: Roofing filters, Tom Whiteside |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Re: Roofing filters, Bill Tippett |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Roofing Filters, Bill Tippett |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Argonaut V F/S, k7gt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |