To: | tentec@contesting.com, Rick@dj0ip.de |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Basic question (especially NR operation) |
From: | Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net> |
Reply-to: | k2xx@swva.net, tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Tue, 03 Aug 2004 11:05:54 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Rick, your description below about the NR performance on the Orion
prompted me to go back to the Doug's and Scott's writeup on Weak Signal
DXing, etc. It was my original impression that the NR function in the
Orion essentially made a comparison between the signal and noise in the
passband and then established a tight window (filter) around the signal
and, in so doing, minimized the noise: "...DSP NR builds a bandpass
filter to automatically reduce noise, it produces the same effect as
manually selecting a very narrow DSP passband filter." Based on their
description, I concluded that for the NR to work properly the desired
signal had to be present when NR is invoked, and if one tuned to a
different signal that one would have turn off the NR and then turn it on
again so it could adapt itself to the new signal and noise conditions.
In other words, having the NR on continuously was not the way to use
it. Your successful experiences suggest that I may have gotten this
wrong, but the write-up (in several places) leads me to believe
otherwise. I wonder if you and others would comment on this point? On another front, I have compared my 1000MP vs. the Orion on weak signal reception (not high QRN conditions) and found that by manipulation of the RF gain, audio DSP and crystal filters on the MP, weak signal readability is equivalent to the Orion. Admittedly, it's a little easier to achieve the same readability with the Orion. Also, despite Sinisa's recommendations to the contrary, I have been running my RF gain wide open and varying the AGC threshold setting (relatively easy with N4PY's software) to maintain band noise and QRN at an acceptable level. Unlike him, I haven't really experimented with various combinations to see if this is really the best approach, but it seems to work reasonably well. 73, Joe NJ0IP wrote:
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin', Mike Hyder -N4NT- |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin', w7kxb |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Basic question, Sinisa Hristov |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Basic question (especially NR operation), Grant Youngman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |