TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] DSP and older Ten Tecs

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] DSP and older Ten Tecs
From: "Ed and Janet" <janed@burgoyne.com>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 21:13:13 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I also bought one of these units and it is not good for CW so I sent it back
I don't work phone so don't know, they may work good there.  Ed K7UC
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ken Brown" <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] DSP and older Ten Tecs


>
> > The ClearSpeech unit
> >analyzes the sound and does a very good job of removing any steady noise
in
> >about a second, hetrodynes included.
> >
> It
>
> >responds slow enough that it can be used with CW that isn't too fast, but
I
> >prefer to shut it off and just tighten the filtering for that and RTTY.
> >
> I have heard, from a local ham who tried one, that for a CW operator
> this is not a desireable product.
>
> > In
> >my case the proximity of the circuitry to the big power supply
transformer
> >resulted in induced hum, but the DSP kills that as well in about a second
> >when the power is turned on.
> >
> If the DSP is killing the induced hum, then you are giving up some of
> the DSP's dynamic range. If you could do some shielding or balancing to
> get rid of that hum using traditional methods, so that the DSP does not
> have to do that work, then the DSP might work even better.
>
> DE N6KB
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>