| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] iCom's approach to the 7800 issues |
| From: | Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Fri, 2 Jul 2004 21:01:21 -0700 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
|
I believe that the way to discuss the technical achievements of
state-of-the-art Ten Tec gear is to discuss Ten Tec gear, with an
occasional comparison. I find the very heavy criticisms of ICOM
disheartening (I don't argue with their "truth") since I don't think it
makes Ten Tec's look better to highlight other manufacturers apparent
failures. Just one man's opinion. Clark WA3JPG _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] 580 help, Duane A Calvin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] 580 help, Duane A Calvin |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] iCom's approach to the 7800 issues, Dennis Healy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] iCom's approach to the 7800 issues, Bernard(wtrone) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |