Re: [TenTec] ARRL's BPL NPRM response is out

["Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>]

Accumulated BPL interfering noise was addressed in the ARRL document as
something that had not been tested by BPL proponents.   A strong point was
made that part 15 applies to point sources like a device, while BPL is a
line source since it is continuously radiated by the lines.   They also made
good point that FCC was overlooking the laws of physics in neglecting the
continuous radiation from a line.
Stuart
K5KVH


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec