| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Orion vs. RX-340 TT Rcvrs. |
| From: | "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:56:28 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> These two radios are just different! The 340 has only > the single wide front end roofing filter, a pair of 2-pole 16 kHz > crystal filters. At one time, I believe Carl had modified his 340 with a switchable 4 kHz roofing filter, similar to the Orion. So, with that filter installed, I suspect performance is equal to the Orion except in cases where the Orion's narrower roofing filter is required (if ever). But with Carl's 4 kHz filter, receiver performance would be equal to the best performance of the new ICOM-7800. -Paul, W9AC |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Orion vs. RX-340 TT Rcvrs., Jim Reid |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Orion vs. RX-340 TT Rcvrs., Ken Brown |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Orion vs. RX-340 TT Rcvrs., Jim Reid |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Orion vs. RX-340 TT Rcvrs., Ken Brown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |