Well said.
As IBM just announced they are sending Linux development (open
source) to asia, count that as work that will 'forevermore' be lost in the
states. Were it radios & their software the result would be the same.
> As a 32-year veteran of the software industry, I have mixed feelings
> about the open-source movement. On the one hand, it makes life easier.
> On the other hand, I don't see how software designers and engineers
> will be able to make a living in an open-source world. Without that
> incentive, there won't be anyone around to write the stuff! Kinda
> reminds me of free music downloads. Really neat for the downloaders,
> but if the artists can't make money for the creativity and effort,
> they won't do it anymore, or will restrict their activities to live
> performances.
Gary
ka1j
> Sorry for the OT comment. Back to net...
>
> 73, Dick WC1M
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martin Ewing [mailto:martin@aa6e.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 11:06 AM
> > To: tentec@contesting.com
> > Subject: [TenTec] Open Source for TT firmware
> >
> >
> > (In another thread) Mark Erbaugh wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm not faulting TenTec in this decision. You can't really
> > expect them to > continuually pour engineering resources
> > into a project without a > corresponding revenue stream. Now
> > that TT has ceased support for the > Pegasus, I hope that
> > they will release the firmware source code to the > general
> > ham public. I'm sure folks like Carl could add new features.
> >
> > I would definitely approve of open sourcing the firmware for
> > all TT radios, but
> > especially for EOL models. I hope TT seriously looks at this
> > proposal. Of
> > course, it's not a simple decision, but I see lots of good results.
> >
> > -Much faster debugging if code is scanned by more expert
> > eyes. -Possible user support for firmware (taking some load
> > off TT?) -User experimentation with new features that could
> > make their way back to the
> > official code if found worthy.
> > -Very good PR with the community, strengthening the
> > user/vendor relationship
> > that is already a key feature of TT products.
> >
> > Against it, though
> > -Loss of proprietary content (if any?), which might extend to
> > TT's commercial
> > product line.
> > -Exposing TT's "spaghetti code" to the world (!)
> > -Someone (TT?) having to play Linus Torvalds and decide what
> > gets into the
> > kernel (we do have a kernel don't we? ;-) and what doesn't.
> > -Requiring a specialized code development environment that
> > most people don't
> > have - possibly a whole breadboard radio, logic analyzers,
> > etc. -Need good documentation of firmware. (not cheap)
> > -Firmware "forks" could confuse the marketplace. -Firmware
> > mods for general use have to be carefully tested against all
> > operating
> > modes - pretty intense stuff.
> >
> > If we could pull it off, it would be a wonderful thing, but
> > I'm not holding my
> > breath.
> >
> > 73- Martin
> >
> > p.s. I'd like to see a radio with an inbuilt Linux OS
> > environment - more
> > standardized and accessible for experimentation.
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|