--- Barry N1EU <n1eu@yahoo.com> wrote:
> <<<Many contesters spend tens of thousands on towers
> and antennas to be able to work one more layer of
> weak
> stations underneath the noise. The Orion's ability
> to
> dig these stations out in the presence of strong
> signals is a bargain. Even a 4-stack can't do
> that!>>>
>
> K5UJ responded "What's implied here, I imagine
> unintentionally, is that if you get an Orion, you
> can
> do without really excellent antennas."
>
> I beg to differ on your interpretation Rob. What's
> implied here is that in the context of big contest
> stations and the money spent to be competitive, the
> investment in an Orion is quite cost effective.
>
My interpretation is that the added cost of the Orion
makes the money that was spent on big antennas that
much more effective. What was implied as I see it is
that the radios heretofore couldn't fully use all of
the signals what the large a antenna array can
provide. Namely the ability to separate the very
strong signals from the now 'just readable' ones that
a lesser antenna system wouldn't even present to to
radio that's on the end of the feed line.
Duane
N9DG
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|