TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review
From: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
Reply-to: Steve Baron - KB3MM <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>,tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 16:35:53 -0000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hardly a key feature.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Kc9cdt@aol.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2003 14:15
Subject: Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review


> OK,
> I'm confused (puzzzled).
>
> If ORION was designed for contesting AND weak DX work. THE WHY DID TT
LEAVE
> OUT A KEY FEATURE? PTT FOR CW?
>
> I am currently interested in the DX capabilities, BUT maybe will get real
> into contesting some day.
>
> Sounds like everyone needs to firmly sugest to TT that we need that
change,
> even if it means sending ORION back to get it updated.
>
> Another question, with all of the reviews, WHY IS IT NONE OF THEM
COMPLAINED
> ABOUT THIS?
>
> Lee
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>