TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review

from [Kc9cdt] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review
From: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 09:15:30 EST
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> 
OK,
I'm confused (puzzzled).

If ORION was designed for contesting AND weak DX work. THE WHY DID TT LEAVE 
OUT A KEY FEATURE? PTT FOR CW?

I am currently interested in the DX capabilities, BUT maybe will get real 
into contesting some day.

Sounds like everyone needs to firmly sugest to TT that we need that change, 
even if it means sending ORION back to get it updated.

Another question, with all of the reviews, WHY IS IT NONE OF THEM COMPLAINED 
ABOUT THIS?

Lee
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [TenTec] Orions & contesting, DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL
Next by Date:  Re: [TenTec] Boosting contesting scores by cheating via aid ofcomputer, ARDUJENSKI
Previous by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review, K3BU
Next by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review, Steve Baron - KB3MM
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]