To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review |
From: | "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Thu, 25 Dec 2003 19:32:56 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> I don't understand why the first dit would be any different than any other > dit. Previous Ten-Tecs run QSK whether in fast (full QSK) or slow (semi-break-in) modes. Unlike other manufacturers, only the receive recovery time changes. Since the second element exhibits no shortening, I suspect that Orion's keying structure is the same as other Ten Tecs. Notice that in the QST Product Review photo, only the first keyed element is affected. Other manufacturer's radios who exhibit element shortening in QSK manifest some degree of shortening on all keyed elements. This is not a trivial difference. As a practical matter, Orion's slight shortening on the first keyed element is not perceived to the listener, provided that all remaining elements in the keyed series are of normal length. (Can someone with an oscilloscope confirm this please?) The shortening of only the first element is no more perceptible during a QSO than say a hard leading edge of the first element that so many other radios exhibit as a result of ALC timing errors. -Paul, W9AC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Roofing filters, Ken Brown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review, K3BU |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review, Carl Moreschi |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review, Art Searle |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |