| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews |
| From: | "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:19:00 -0000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
W4ZV, with all due respect, I wouldn't take K1UO result on CQ WW CW on 160 m as a high praise to undisputed Orion RX capabilities! This is such a small single sample: 160: 172 18 62 I often laugh on Eham reviews but I consider them as a good cross-section of USA hams feelings today. I can't find any good argument to dispute 35/20 top marks of 5.0 to old JA rigs IC765/IC781. I learnt a new meaning of the word "fluff" thanks to TT forum! 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] KR5 Schematic Help, - |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] KR5 Schematic Help, Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] KR5 Schematic Help, - |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews, Bill Tippett |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |