To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Solid State Amplifiers |
From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Mon, 08 Dec 2003 10:33:43 -1000 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Hi All, My experience with solid state amplifiers on HF is limited to one amplifier, the SCG SG-500. I bought this amplifier because I was doing 160 meter contest operations from locations that had no commercial grid power, and I wanted to be able to run significantly more than 100 watts. At the time I was using a Kenwood TS-440 transceiver, and I had already converted a Heath SB-201 to operate on 160 meters. The TS-440 has pretty good QSK and I got used to having QSK. So when I started using the SB-201, which is not a QSK amplifier, I put together some circuitry to switch the receive signal around the amplifier and directly to a RX only antenna jack that I installed on the TS-440. When I got the SG-500, this same setup worked to give me QSK functionality, with an amplifier that is not a QSK amplifier. I never had a problem with the SG-500. It performed as advertised. It has numerous protection features which prevented me from ever blowing it up, even though I did occasionally make a few blunders that might have blown it up without the protection. One of the protection features that it has is an internal attenuator on the input, which automatically switches in if you give it too much drive. With the TS-440 turning down the CAR (RF output) control resulted in a funny, soft leading edge, CW keying envelope. I might have been able to make some tweaks to the ALC on the TS-440 to make it sound right at 50 watts output, and then I probably would not be able to use it at 100 watts anymore. So I built a power attenuator. A bunch of 2 watt carbon composition resistors in a T configuration made about 2.5 dB attenuation. Putting it in a one quart paint can full of mineral oil made it handle the power nicely. The other thing that was a lot of work, was finding and carrying a power supply system that will provide the 100 amperes peak that the SG-500 needs. I used many different combinations of multiple paralleled power supplies and batteries. I always made it work. It was always a hassle though. The SG-500 is not the perfect amplifer for me, however I must say that it is an excellent product, which does what the manufacturer says it will do. I still have it, because someday I plan on using it for a mobile setup. I am really curious to find out how susceptable to RF some of the high power car audio systems on the streets are. Now I have an Omni VI and a Titan. The QSK is much better, and it puts out the legal limit. And the setup is much less complicated than the kludge that I had put together to make the SG-500 work the way I wanted it to. Ken N6KB
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Re: DRIFTING (lab), David McClafferty |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Solid State Amps, Stuart Rohre |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Solid State Amplifiers, andrew poteete |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] FS: Delta 580, Zivney, Terry L. |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |