| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] QTH.net Ten-Tec group |
| From: | John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Mon, 06 Oct 2003 16:22:15 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Jim Lowman has done a great job administering the Ten-Tec reflector groups.
I belong to this one and the QTH group. I find the QTH group's postings are
more focused and concise, whereas we can--and do--get into
near-philosophical threads on this reflector that can seem endless. Also, I
don't recall seeing any flames on the QTH site. Remember the working over
W5YR got here a while back?
All in all, I think both reflectors serve a useful purpose, but I don't have to administer them. John, W3ULS |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Mode Index Switch Question Corsair II, OTAKEBI |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] New group for Orion, J. D. Beischel |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Mode Index Switch Question Corsair II, OTAKEBI |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] QTH.net Ten-Tec group, George, W5YR |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |