In a message dated 07/06/2003 13:00:58 Eastern Daylight Time, K3BU@aol.com
writes:
<< Looks like there is a need for as unbiased as possible review. >>
Don't know if it is still true, but RADCOM (a/k/a "Radio Communications",
the
Journal of the Radio Society of Great Britain) used to be famous for
bluntly
honest reviews. If they found a fault, they reported it. Don't know if
this
is still true; any RADCOM readers on the reflector?
k3yd
You have obviously missed the point!! It doesn't matter what the review
states. If it doesn't agree with someones own mindset, it is obviously
flawed!! That is the mindset that seems to prevail, or at least appears so
according to many responses to this thread. There has been many responses
that even compare the radio equipment tests to automobiles, ATVs and guns.
Let us hope that all this flak doesn't prevent someone from reporting and
posting his own evaluation of a particular RADIO for the list. Let the list
reader themselves decide whether they are going to let this
evaluation/report/opinion influence their judgement and quietly decide
themselves rather than start throwing rocks (killing the messenger)at the
post.
Good day,
Jim
_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
|