When I look at any of the messages sent via the
reflector, the sender's address is always in the
FROM address field.
It is a very simple matter to cut the sender's address
from this field, click REPLY, then highlight the list
address in the TO field and paste the original sender's
address over it. This works great and insures that
only the orignal sender gets the reply
With all of the important things going on in the world,
I'm not sure why so much discussion has taken
place in the last month over this trivial issue.
73,
Mike - WB4HUC
Austin, TX
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Malloy" <jmalloy@stny.rr.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 4:04 PM
Subject: RE: [TenTec] Group replies vs. personal e-mail
> The problem is acute for me, Scott, I receive mail individually and have
> little choice: when I try to reply to one or reply to group it gives me
the
> same address in the "to:" line - i.e., tentec@contesting.com. If there is
> no email address given in the message for the person I'm replying to,
well,
> either everyone gets the mail or, more than likely, I just give up. It
> wasn't always like this and the change has reduced my use of and pleasure
in
> the list.
>
> And so it goes...
>
> 73,
>
> Joe, W2RBA
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com
> > [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Scott Rosenfeld
> > [N7JI]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 3:42 PM
> > To: tentec@contesting.com
> > Subject: [TenTec] Group replies vs. personal e-mail
> >
> >
> > Here's the question - I receive all of my messages from this
> > reflector via
> > e-mail. When I hit REPLY it asks whether to send to the sender, or to
> > everyone.
> >
> > Maybe for some reason people can't get their programs to reply to just a
> > single person.
> >
> > And I don't really have a problem with replies going to everyone on the
> > list (me included) but when it involves sales of items, how people want
> > to get paid, bargaining, etc., that's stuff that really should be done
> > "in private," "offline."
> >
> > If it's a case of cutting and pasting into a new e-mail in another mail
> > program, it seems that it would be prudent to do that...
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
|