| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Re: # 4 Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ? |
| From: | "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Tue, 4 Mar 2003 11:21:29 -1000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
From: "Stuart Rohre" > I disagree that the ARRL test method is inaccurate. Read Ed Hare's piece in the July/August, 2002, QEX, pgs. 50 and 51, along with the surrounding paper by Doug Smith, pgs. 46 - 52. Many sources of inaccuracies are discussed and admitted. 73, Jim KH7M |
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Re:Omni VI Plus Filters needed, Jan Scheuerman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] may order more airpax breakers, Irvin Weinman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re: # 4 Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, Stuart Rohre |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re: # 4 Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, Stuart Rohre |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |