| To: | "'tentec@contesting.com'" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] Receivability |
| From: | "Scanandoah, Alan" <ascanand@harris.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:25:08 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Over the weekend, I handed out a few random points for CQWW. Not being much of an SSB op, I found the wall-to-wall cacophony to be difficult to deal with. This prompted me to do some A/B checks to see if one rig could hear better than another; I compared my Omni V to my Omni A. Surprisingly, even though the Omni A is lacking in the IF selectivity department, I found it much easier to pick out signals. The overall product at the speaker just seemed to be much more readable. Has anyone else had similar experiences? 73 - Al, K2ZN |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] TT net on 7.288, Bill Fulling |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Receivability, Mike Hyder -N4NT- |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] TT net on 7.288, Bill Fulling |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Receivability, Mike Hyder -N4NT- |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |