TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564

from [Paul Christensen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: <ernie@n2ojq.com>, "Jim Miller" <k4sqr@juno.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564
From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 08:04:22 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> 
> Do you feel it is ethical for someone to advertise a 563 with upgrades as
> "Omni VI+" when they try to sell it?

As long as it is in some way listed as "Omni Six Plus - Factory Option 3
Upgraded."

-Paul, W9AC
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564, Paul Christensen
Next by Date:  Re: [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564, Bill Nicolson
Previous by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564, Jim Miller
Next by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564, Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]