| To: | "Paul Valko" <w8kc@comcast.net>, "jdanter" <jdanter@mail.i-america.net>, "TenTec List" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Qs-Triton IV |
| From: | "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net> |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Jul 2002 20:52:22 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> That's a late-early model Triton IV. The later Triton IV Digitals had to be > "renamed" Model 544. But don't freak out! It's a Ten*Tec not a Yacomwood > so there's no such thing as late model "mods" to make it useful. That's the truth Paul. Come to think of it, Ten-Tec is the only manufacturer of equipment where I do not have to conduct an exhaustive research into the serial number-mod sheet to see if it's a "80 or 90 million S/N rig." With other manufacturers, variances in the S/N can mean the difference of hundreds of dollars. -Paul, W9AC |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] re Net frequency, JC Quinn |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec] Why no DSP upgrades for the 6N2?, KE4TEG |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Qs-Triton IV, Paul Valko |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] FSK with Paragon, Dick White |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |