To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Re: Fluid motion antenna |
From: | rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre) |
Date: | Tue, 2 Apr 2002 15:29:29 -0600 |
You can accept compromise in the element spacing but then you are back to having a less than optimum situation, just as you do if you have traps. Linear decoupling has not lumped elements with loss, thus should be the most mechanically elegant band switching scheme, but does increase the diameter of the element with regard to wind load. What you gain in one area is inevitably given up somewhere else, ie there is no free lunch! Hi! 73, Stuart K5KVH --- but the human condition is to keep trying to get something almost free! |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] what is "quiet"?, Duane Grotophorst |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Orion RF hardening (was Is Jupiter better...), Stuart Rohre |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Re: Fluid motion antenna, George, W5YR |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] 2591 H/T - Value?, Matt & Sue Kastigar |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |