bob:
What do you meant by "decent QSK"?
Steve
N4LQ
----- Original Message -----
From: "wb4mnf" <wb4mnf@atl.org>
To: "David Hammond" <dhhdeh@concentric.net>
Cc: "tentec reflector" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:44 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] It's "Only" 1.7 dB
> The Orion has the most sophisticated DSP of anything else on the ham
> market, by a long shot. Even were it 3db difference (100 vs 200)
> it's a heck of a lot easier to increase output power than it is
> to improve the receiver...
> Plus, none of the JA rigs that I've seen have decent QSK or someone
> in engineering who will respond to an email...
> Now where the heck are the 1324, RX-340, and 350 block diagrams and
> schematics??? How to decide if I can't see how it works...
>
> -bob
>
> David Hammond wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > I am a stickler on points like this. Consistency lends credibility.
> > Forget the actual benefit or lack thereof from having 100 vs. 150 watts.
> >
> > If the point of the Orion is to create a transceiver that bests all the
> > current offerings of Japan and the top HF offerings from Japan have
150-200
> > watts out and internal tuner capability then isn't the Orion falling
short
> > before it gets off of the drawing board?
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
|