To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Carl, Pmni, 756 etc |
From: | W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch) |
Date: | Sat, 16 Mar 2002 21:06:11 -0500 |
Hi Carl, > Let me describe the main receive characteristics of the rx340. I do > not consider the 10 khz dynamic range specs to be meaningless. If you > have ever run in field day with lots of transmitters in the near > field, one of the most challenging things for a receiver to do is > operate on SSB with another transmitter on CW on the same band or > viceversa. Most receivers fail miserably at this. That actually is one of the least challenging applications, and has little to do with how the receiver works with close signal spacing. Only the stages in front of the roofing filter are involved in wide-split overload. If we look at manufacturer and old ARRL tests and reviews, we see they all like to measure outside the roofing filter passband with 10-20kHz spacing or wider. Almost anything looks good at wide spacing. > That said, if your are inside the roofing filter, you are obviously > limited to the dynamic range of the DSP chip. This is 40 db. So for > signals that are closer than 10 khz to the desired signal, 40 db is > all the dynamic range you have. When an undesired signal is within 10 > khz of the desired signal and stronger than 40 db above the desired > signal, the analog AGC will come up some to keep the DSP processor > from overloading. This is done as best as it can be by the rx340 > hardware and I find I rarely get into this situation. I don't know what the selectivity ahead of the DSP is. If the blocking or IM DR of the DSP system is 40 dB and if the receiver **can't** use a 500Hz or narrower roofing filter on CW or a 2.5kHz roofing filter on SSB, the receiver would offer poor performance in many real-world situations. It might be fine for casual SSB use (wide filters) in urban or some suburban locations, but stay away from weak-signal CW on the low bands, especially if there are multiple signals in the passband of the roofing filter! As a matter of fact, that DR is about the performance of a typical PSK system. You should hear the PSK folks whine and bellyache about overload when a high power (100 watt transmitter) signal comes on a kHz from them! 73, Tom W8JI W8JI@contesting.com |
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Lightning protection, Tom Rauch |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Lightning: What cable routing...?, Larry Gibbs |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Carl, Pmni, 756 etc, Bill Taylor(W4WBT) |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Carl, Pmni, 756 etc, Steve Ellington |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |