Good one!
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Peacock" <ve3ios@servers.ca>
To: "Mike Hyder - N4NT -" <N4NT@chartertn.net>; <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 3:37 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Corsair audio
> What about a ventriloquist hihi?
> Jeff
> ve3ios
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Hyder - N4NT -" <N4NT@chartertn.net>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 2:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Corsair audio
>
>
> > Nobody knows what he, himself, sounds like.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
> > To: "Ronald Hands" <ronald.hands@sympatico.ca>
> > Cc: <tentec@contesting.com>
> > Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 11:46 AM
> > Subject: Re: [TenTec] Corsair audio
> >
> >
> > > Just one, Ron:
> > >
> > > Quit trying to set up your transmit audio by relying upon on-air
> contacts
> > > with "friends" or worse, casual QSO partners.
> > >
> > > I can predict with almost 100% certainty that you will just end up
with
> > > about as many opinions as the product of the number of mics and setups
> > > times the number of people involved, plus a few more since some of the
> > > people lie and others change their minds.
> > >
> > > The point here is that only *you* know what you sound like and what
you
> > > expect to sound like on the radio and only you can be relied to be
> > > completely honest with yourself. Even a close friend that knows your
> voice
> > > may not be inclined to be totally honest in reporting his impression
of
> > how
> > > Mic A sounds compared to Mic B. People are people and they all change
> from
> > > day to day. And they might expect that you *want* to hear that
expensive
> > > Mic A really does sound better than junker Mic B.
> > >
> > > I suggest that you use a second receiver - a good one with a clean
audio
> > > system - and a good set of headphones with it to monitor your
> transmitted
> > > signal. Put a dummy antenna on both your transmitter and the monitor
> > > receiver. Tune in your own signal very carefully using the widest SSB
> > > filters you have. Be very careful not to overload the monitor
receiver.
> > You
> > > should see an S7 to S9 signal on its meter at the most.
> > >
> > > Now, you are prepared to audition *your* voice on various microphones
> > > and/or equalization settings, etc. and to select what sounds to you
> either
> > > (a) most like how you think your voice sounds or (b) what you would
> *like*
> > > to sound like on the air.
> > >
> > > If you haven't done this, I would expect that it will take you maybe 2
> > > minutes to try all three mics and find which one comes closest to
> meeting
> > > your goals. If none of them do, then it may be time to use a small mic
> > > premp/equalizer to shape the mic output to suit you.
> > >
> > > I have used the W2IHY EQ/Noise-Gate unit very successfully with
several
> > > microphones to tailor the sound. I presently am using the Behringer
> MX602A
> > > Mixer/EQ unit as the main audio control center in the shack to handle
> all
> > > transmit, receive, computer, and scope monitor audio as well as to
drive
> a
> > > power amp and speaker system. The flexibility of shaping your voice
> signal
> > > has to be heard to be believed. And for $70, it is quite a buy. It
works
> > > equally well for shaping received audio so you can listen to other
> signals
> > > and make them sound best to your ears.
> > >
> > > This long harangue boils down to one fact: you can rarely believe what
> > > other people tell you from on-air contacts about how your audio
sounds.
> > > They are hearing you through their own receivers and filters and their
> own
> > > speakers and finally their own ears, and evaluating what they perceive
> > > according to "their" standards of what you should sound like.
> > >
> > > I gave up years ago asking "how does my audio sound?" unless I was
> looking
> > > for a trouble report based upon my suspicion that something had gone
> > wrong.
> > >
> > > Hope this is of some help and not too discouraging . . .but the bottom
> > line
> > > is that I do not believe that there is any "best mic" for any radio.
> Like
> > > most other things in life, "it depends."
> > >
> > > 72/73/oo, George W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas
> > > Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in Collin county EM13qe
> > > Amateur Radio W5YR, in the 56th year and it just keeps getting better!
> > > QRP-L 1373 NETXQRP 6 SOC 262 COG 8 FPQRP 404 TEN-X 11771 I-LINK 11735
> > > Icom IC-756PRO #02121 Kachina #91900556 IC-765 #02437
> > >
> > > All outgoing email virus-checked by Norton Anti-Virus 2002
> > >
> > >
> > > Ronald Hands wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There seems to have been a fair bit of discussion about
microphones
> > > > lately, which leads me to ask: is there any consensus on a
> particularly
> > > > good desk mike for the Corsair II?
> > > > I've had my Corsair for three or four years, but use it mainly
for
> > > > CW so I haven't bothered about microphones. However, I've recently
> had
> > > > occasion to crank it up on SSB a bit more often and have been
testing
> > > > different microphones -- and growing more confused by the minute.
> > > > Did a test the other night between a Shure 444 and a Drake hand
> > > > mike. Everybody said the 444 was best. Then I did a test today
with
> a
> > > > friend who knows my voice. Used three mikes: the 444, the Drake and
a
> > > > TenTec 701 hand mike. The verdict was that the Drake was far
> superior,
> > > > the 444 came second and the Ten Tec was a distant third.
> > > > Obviously I need more choices. Any recommendations?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
> >
>
>
|