To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Inrad filter for the OMNI 6+ vs TenTec filter ? |
From: | geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer) |
Date: | Thu, 18 Jan 2001 06:54:19 -0600 |
The original Tentec filters ARE as sharp as they need to be while not ringing on static and ignition noise and high speed CW. Sharper filters may not perform as well. I know some sharper filters from Kenwood and Collins do not handle static and high speed CW well. 73, Jerry, K0CQ -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] AT-11MP, Bill_Ames@hyperion.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] AT-11MP, Avila, Edward |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Inrad filter for the OMNI 6+ vs TenTec filter ?, DK2GZ@aol.com |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] TT Titan and other TT QSK amp issues, agtaylor@llnl.gov |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |