No! Send it to me!! I can always use a second Omni Six Plus!!! Besides, mine
is off a whopping 4-5 Hz and I just can't live with that. I'll rummage
through yours for extra parts so I can repair mine!!!
Vince/K7NA
> From: "Ken & Rose Kreis" <kia@netins.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 19:06:49 -0500
> To: "Ten-Tec Reflector" <Tentec@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] For Sale: OMNI VI (upgraded to plus) -- I've had it!!
>
>
> Dale,
>
> ship that inaccurate piece of junk to the address below. I can use that
> lousy rig in my truck for mobile. The faulty display will not bother me
> because I don't look at the display when mobile.
>
> Ship to:
>
> Ken Kreis, KA0W
> 1064 Hickory Ave.
> Rudd, IA 50471
> kia@netins.net
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dale L Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org>
> To: "Ten-Tec Reflector" <Tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 6:27 PM
> Subject: [TenTec] For Sale: OMNI VI (upgraded to plus) -- I've had it!!
>
>
>>
>>
>> After reading about someone's experiences with getting their radio back in
>> calibration, I decided to check mine.
>>
>> My OMNI VI (upgraded to plus) is 18 Hz off frequency.
>>
>> Now, I've only had this radio since 1996 and the darn thing is already
> that
>> far off. This is just no good. What's happened to ham radio?
>>
>> I can't live with this 18 Hz off frequency business.
>>
>> How am I ever going to make another QSO?
>>
>> I'm tired of people telling me I'm 18 Hz off frequency. Geez.
>>
>> I can't work DX anymore because I can't find them from the packet spots
>> given on the local PacketCluster.
>>
>> This 38 Hz off-frequency business is really a downer.
>>
>> I don't wear watches anymore because they lose or gain time after a while.
>> The last one I had lost 3 seconds over about 9 months. Geez.
>>
>> I even got rid of an Athlon 900 MHz computer because the clock was off by
>> 0.05 seconds over four months. Intolerable.
>>
>> I've finally put a piece of electrical tape over the lower right-hand
> corner
>> of the monitor screen just so I don't have to be reminded about how far
> off
>> the clock of my old 386 computer is (at last check, it was 0.0004 seconds
>> off and that was based on the average of 57 different time checks to
> account
>> for multi-path propagation delays).
>>
>> What's happened to technology??????
>>
>>
>> Dale L. Martin, KG5U
>> kg5u@hal-pc.org
>> http://www.hal-pc.org/~kg5u
>>
>> :-)
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
>> Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
>> Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
>> Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
> Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
|