TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Scout VS. DX-77

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Scout VS. DX-77
From: weingaertner@nac.net (Robert Weingaertner)
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 12:15:55 -0400
You're absolutely right, Duane. The QST reviews give real lab test
results, and these are what I rely on the most, plus the cw
waveform photos. Most of the rest in any review is subjective.

        73, Bob WB2VUF

dacalvin@us.ibm.com wrote:
> 
> Hey, at least they TRY to do a review - not like CQ mag where the company
> ad writer might as well provide the copy!
> 
>      73,  Duane
> 
> Duane A. Calvin
> Server Systems Test Engineer
> Dept. 76TS   RS/6000 - SP Nodes
> IBM Austin, TX      >O<     Tie: 793-3368
> 
> Robert Weingaertner <weingaertner@nac.net> on 10/29/99 06:12:30 AM
> 
> Please respond to weingaertner@nac.net
> 
> To:   Carl Hyde <cshyde@yahoo.com>
> cc:   jreber@es.com, seweber@netnitco.net, walter@inlink.com,
>       TenTec@contesting.com
> Subject:  Re: [TenTec] Scout VS. DX-77
> 
> Carl Hyde wrote:
> >
> > You have to understand the story behing the review of
> > the Delta II that was published in QST.
> 
> I always thought thatthe Delta II review as a little harsh. If it
> had gotten a better review I might have bought one instead of a
> Paragon. Its sad that there is no editorial review process.
> However, I think that QST has been biased in favor of import rigs
> for years. I've seen glaring deficiencies minimized in the reviews.
> Also, a radio can fall victim to the reviewer's peresonal preferences.
> For example, QST did not like the Drake R8 because the ergonomics
> were not deemed suitable for contesting. Well, boys and girls, the
> R8 was designed as an SWL receiver, not a contest machine.
> 
> Forunately today we have this reflector, so in the absence of "try
> before buy", we can at least ask someone who owns one.
> 
>           73, Bob WB2VUF (Proud owner of a Paragon I,
>           Corsair I, Scout, and even some PM modules!)
> 
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
> Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
> Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
> 
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
> Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
> Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>