I am trying to decide if it is better for a transciever to NOT have a general
coverage receiver. There seems to be a couple of schools of thought on this.
Some say the rig will perform better on the ham-only-bands if it doesn't have
GC. Some like to have GC to SWL and it also seems to help on the resale value
somewhat but at the cost of ham-band-only performance when you are "hamming"!
Is this true? I would like to hear what everyones opinion on this is.
Thanks,
73
Scott,kc0bus
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|