I'm afraid I am also a bit skeptical of comparisons to the Kachina - look
at the contents of the two boxes (not that that means the specs have to
be that much better on the Kachina). Wait for ARRL Labs to publish their
measurements - that ought to be something fairly objective we can use to
compare them.
73, Duane AC5AA
On Mon, 25 Oct 1999 21:08:08 -0400 "David Ward" <wa1rd@home.com> writes:
>
> I was smugly put down on the air tonight by some folk who were
> (perhaps
> rightly) tired of me singing the praises of the Pegasus. They were
> quoting
> some info (from Kachina I presume) saying the Pegasus in no way
> comparable
> to the Kachina, i.e. in design or execution. I thought I read that
> there
> were, in fact, many similar components in both radios. Anyone know
> what this
> is about?
> Dave Wa1rd@home.com
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
> Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
> Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
Duane A. Calvin, AC5AA
Austin, Texas
ac5aa@juno.com -or- ac5aa@earthlink.net
Day: dacalvin@us.ibm.com
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|