To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Y2K |
From: | talbot@kmrmail.kmr.ll.mit.edu (George Arthur Talbot) |
Date: | Thu, 5 Nov 1998 12:34:02 +1200 (KST) |
Faithful Ten-Techies, I have yet a more fundamental problem that I argue with my coworkers continually. Does the new day start at 0000 or 0001. My contention (as I red in my circa 1959 ARRL handbook which is no more) is that 2400 and 0000 are the _same time_ but 2400 refers to the end of the day and 0000 refers to the beginning of the new day. But with their 'military mentality' and as they were trained the new day starts at 0001. I guess they do not like to start counting from zero. I asked them what time they would log if an event happened 29 seconds after the new day? They could not give adequate explanation that fit into the new day starting at 0001. "Well I've been doing it that way for 20 something years!" I would also ask what happened to the minute between 2400 and 0001. Still no answer. Some people! George V73GT PS. Now we have to deal with the Y2K problem and whether the new century starts at January 1, 2000 or January 1, 2001....Oh well! Just ask them to count to four starting at zero. Zero, one, two, three! Easy! You learn a lot 'doing digital'. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] european electronic equipment, Paul Plasters |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Y2K, Caitlyn M. Martin |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Y2K, Del Seay |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Y2K, Jim Reid |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |