If the CQ'ing station misses the exchange, all he has to do is LISTEN.
The inheriting station is going to send it all again to the next guy.
Decrement # by 1.
Dave Hachadorian, K6LL
Yuma, AZ
On 2/6/2024 10:37 AM, Jack Brindle via CQ-Contest wrote:
It is easier than that. The CQ station sends their exchange first, giving the calling
station a chance to request fills if needed. So we know the calling station will get
the exchange. The problem then is that the CQ station may not get the calling
station’s exchange. If that happens, there is no QSO and thus nothing to log.
The calling station will get a NIL for the Q he logged.
A double Q removal for NIL should be plenty of incentive, and we have that
already.
73,
Jack, W6FB
On Feb 6, 2024, at 11:22 AM, NM5M<nm5meric@gmail.com> wrote:
A solution to the ack issue is to make a QSO count (via log checking) only if
the info is correct on both sides.
Those super competitive would be incentivized to be sure their info was
received correctly.
Eric NM5M
Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|