To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Most cost-effective sending of qsl's direct to qsl bureaus via delivery services |
From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
Date: | Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:53:11 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
LOTWWith a K9 call, I overwhelmed the W9 Bureau when I moved to California in 2006. JAs have an award for the quantity of paper cards. I was getting more cards than all others in the Bureau combined! I stopped using the Bureau ten years ago, because JAs were causing the Bureau to be 2-3 years behind. Now, I only send paper cards to US hams who are chasing awards like County Hunters, whose sponsors are so behind the times that they won't accept screen prints of LOTW confirmations. 73, Jim K9YC On 1/22/2024 11:56 AM, kq2m@kq2m.com wrote: I would appreciate any information that you can share on what cost-effective and reliable services there are out there that you have successfully used when sending boxes of qsl's overseas. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Most cost-effective sending of qsl's direct to qsl bureaus via delivery services, kq2m |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Most cost-effective sending of qsl's direct to qsl bureaus via delivery services, K3ZJ David Siddall |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Most cost-effective sending of qsl's direct to qsl bureaus via delivery services, kq2m |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Most cost-effective sending of qsl's direct to qsl bureaus via delivery services, Yuri |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |