I want to thank the many ops who were kind enough to their thoughts,
experiences and insights on
on the FTDX10 and the FTDX101MP vs. the FT1000MP as well as on other
radios.
I have never chased tech but let it "come to me" after learning of most
of the issues, plusses, minuses, etc. through everyone else's
experience.
I do need to upgrade my receiver and so many other things but have so
little time available to do it.
Tnx again and 73
Bob, KQ2M
On 2022-11-29 21:34, Bruce Horn wrote:
Hi Bob,
I think almost any modern transceiver will outperform an FT1000MP -
it's pretty old technology. Here's a link to NC0B's receiver
performance comparison. I suggest having an e-mail discussion with him
about transceivers for contesting. As I recall he didn't like the
FTDX10, but it was more about the controls.
http://www.sherweng.com/table.html
I owned an FT-1000MP long ago - purchased it to pair with a FT-1000D.
73 de Bruce, WA7BNM (bhorn@hornucopia.com)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Shohet, KQ2M" <kq2m@kq2m.com>
To: "cq-contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2022 5:27:30 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] FTDX10 and FTDX101MP vs. FT1000MP
Hi,
I'm hearing very good things about these two new radios FTDX10 and
FTDX101MP - I'm wondering what, if anything, you have heard and how
they
compare to the FT1000MP which I have used for the past 25 years?
I would especially appreciate hearing from long-time FT1000MP users who
recently tested one or both radios.
Please reply off-reflector to kq2m@kq2m.com
Tnx & 73
Bob, KQ2M
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|