QST/ARRL and Rob Sherwood have tested the radio. The key clicks are definitely
gone.
Clarifier is Yaesu-speak for RIT/XIT.
I agree about the spectrum display averaging.
73,
Scott K9MA
----------
Scott Ellington
--- via iPad
> On Jun 27, 2021, at 5:25 PM, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/26/2021 12:23 PM, K9MA wrote:
>> I've only had the radio a week or so, but I'm disappointed in it in many
>> respects. Now, I'm a CW contester, and I'm fussy, so many others will
>> probably not mind what I see as shortcomings. On the other hand, a lot of
>> these issues would concern any serious CW contester. There's no question
>> that the basic performance of the radio, like receiver dynamic range and
>> transmitter IMD, is excellent.
>
> How do you know that? Has someone competent measured these quantities? Other
> recent (last 5 years) Yaesu products have been notorious for bad splatter on
> SSB, and have been notorious for clicks for decades.
>> Here's my list:
>> 1. Very loud relays in QSK with separate rx antenna (much quieter with
>> common tx/rx antenna)
>> 2. Lack of per band power setting memory
>> 3. AGC allows too much audio variation, no setting (this is strictly a
>> personal preference)
>> 4. Clarifier with ring control far too sensitive, even with 5 Hz steps
>
> What's a "clarifier?"
>
>> 5. CW Sideband changes when changing bands (?)
>> 6. Panadapter lacks averaging mode option
>
> A spectrum display that can't do good averaging is next to useless, and a
> marketing ploy.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|