CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW is a Great Contest -- NOT

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW is a Great Contest -- NOT
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 23:27:56 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 12/2/2020 5:08 PM, rjairam@gmail.com wrote:
Some of the west coast is now remoting out East now, so what's the problem?

A large part of the fun for me is doing it from a station that I built, and I have greater respect for guys like my neighbor K6XX who built all of his, than for guys who haven't done that, just that walk in and operate. When Bob lost his home and station in a wildfire three months ago, I offered him my station for any test that he chose to operate. He thanked me, but instead said he wanted to work from what he could rebuild on the ruins.

My point here is that contest scoring rules should not strongly favor one region over another, but it's obvious from where I sit that the rules strongly favor the people who make them. K6XX has made to a couple of WRTCs, and during the one in Boston, he had the chance to operate someone's station there (not as a WRTC competitor). He told me on his return that it was a completely different contest. THAT'S the problem.

And, I repeat, CQWW IS a very simple-minded contest. All you have to do is get the call right and the logging software does the rest for the vast majority of stations you're going to work. Yes, US, VE, VK, and Russia are exceptions. Compare that to a contest like SS where you actually have to copy something the logging program doesn't tell you.

73, Jim K9YC


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>