CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Key Clicks.... Continuing Problem

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Key Clicks.... Continuing Problem
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 10:45:35 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 11/13/2020 6:30 PM, Randy Thompson wrote:
Bandwidth seems to be the best metric for determining signal quality.  A signal 
is either within expected norms for the given mode or not.  The challenge is 
how to measure that after the contest.

Occupied bandwidth can be clearly observed on a combined spectrum and waterfall display. If a recording can preserve spectrum and present it to such a display, and if the offending station is strong enough relative to other stations, it should be practical to assess compliance with an appropriately designed rule. I'd be happy to participate in concocting one. Three resources are on my website.

http://k9yc.com/FTDX5000_Report.pdf
http://k9yc.com/TXNoise.pdf
http://k9yc.com/K6XXAmpTalk.pdf

When digesting these, note that while my measurements were done using a K3/P3/SVGA to observe other signals, there are now many other good hardware options. Also note that K6XX is highly regarded contester both as a contester and as an engineer-- he is a production engineer at Elecraft, and was responsible for putting both of their power amps into production.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>