To: | "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines |
From: | K3TN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | jpescatore@aol.com |
Date: | Wed, 28 Oct 2020 09:53:42 +0000 (UTC) |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
The approach does not represent change - sounds like the thought was "Hey, back in 2014 when we did the W1AW/ operations, this approach worked out pretty well." Of course, that wasn't a contest. In 2015, using my call, as a remote M/M from K4VVunder the existing rules, five of us (K4XD N1RM WØYR W3UL W4TMO) came in 10th in the ARRL DX CW as a fully remote M/M operation - when a blizzard meant most of us would never have been able to reach the station anyway. Hams are pretty good at innovating around obstacles, contesters are really good at it! 73 John K3TN _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB Log Deadline Approaching, John Dorr |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines, Hans Brakob |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines, Jim Brown |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Sep 2020 CW Sprint - Full Results, Ward Silver |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |