Many in each category (minimum and aggressive) are fairly infrequent
spotters, Andy, with the "minimums" contributing only limited amounts of
pollution to the spot pool. However, I will write in the next couple of
days to the few that are prolific spotters, and suggest they tighten up
to "normal."
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.
On 8/12/2020 8:08 PM, Andy KU7T wrote:
Aggressive is needed for 6m here, otherwise I am spotting a lot of
Europe from W7 😊. Otherwise, Normal is the way to go.
Why would we ever need Minimum?
If just for experimenting, could RBN network reject spots from those
spotters?
Andy
KU7T
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows 10
*From: *N4ZR <mailto:n4zr@comcast.net>
*Sent: *Wednesday, August 12, 2020 4:43 PM
*To: *Björn Ekelund <mailto:bjorn@ekelund.nu>
*Cc: *reflector cq-contest <mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
*Subject: *Re: [CQ-Contest] Why were there so many busted skimmer
spots during WAE?
Good thought. We recommend normal validation for CW and aggressive for
RTTY. Currently, with 145 nodes connected, 11 are running minimal
validation and 10 are running aggressive
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.
On 8/12/2020 1:38 PM, Björn Ekelund wrote:
> Unfortunately it seems some skimmer operators use the "minimal"
> setting rather
> than "normal" for callsign validation in CW Skimmer Server. Probably
> because they
> like large spot counts. Or just out of ignorance.
>
> It's enough with one single skimmer with a good antenna to be set like
> this to litter the
> cluster with busted spots.
>
> Björn SM7IUN
>
> Den ons 12 aug. 2020 kl 18:19 skrev N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net
> <mailto:n4zr@comcast.net>>:
>
> Interesting question, Barry. Any particular pattern you noticed,
> like
> WAE appended to the callsign, or whatever? There have been no
> changes
> to CW Skimmer in years.
>
> Something to consider is connecting to a reliable AR Cluster V6 node
> like NC7J and activating the CT1BOH extensions. ARC V6 itself also
> includes various filters that can be used to be significantly more
> "skeptical" about the spots you are sent.
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
> at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
> spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
> For spots, please use your favorite
> "retail" DX cluster.
>
> On 8/11/2020 8:53 PM, Barry W2UP wrote:
> > Title says it all. I've never seen so many bad skimmer spots.
> >
> > Barry W2UP (@W4YY for the contest)
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com <mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com <mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|