To: | Mike Smith VE9AA <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>, cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] States vs Sections |
From: | Jack <vhfplus@gmail.com> |
Date: | Mon, 3 Feb 2020 12:07:20 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On 2/3/2020 9:12 AM, Mike Smith VE9AA wrote: I really hope they don't change, Mike, especially SS. I enjoy being one of two stations active in ONN! :>D"W3WN: Imagine the chaos is one state contest used sections and the next state contest used states! Oh, the humanity!"..I don't know if it's official for any contests yet, but you can maybe/possibly/(I am guessing) expect changes in the ARRL 160, ARRL SS and last but not least the California QSO Party.< 73, Jack, VE3RUA/K0JP _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] [N1MM+] New Super Check Partial files available, Mike Smith VE9AA |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m contest-vs-DXCC rule problem, rjairam@gmail.com |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] States vs Sections, Mike Smith VE9AA |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] ONN QRV? (was States...), Art Boyars |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |