I invited a rookie to my station last year. We couldn’t find very many
participants. It made a bad impression.
Stan, K4SBZ
"Real radio bounces off the sky."
> On Nov 5, 2019, at 10:52 AM, Joe <nss@mwt.net> wrote:
>
> The Rookie Roundup is dismal! It is NOTHING like the Novice Roundup of like
> the 70's
> Participation levels are soo low, that a pretty good portion of the sections,
> you can make just one contact and take first place because no one enters in
> from there.
>
> When the ARRL thought about bringing this contest back, I wish they kept the
> same old format of like 9 or 10 days operating window, but still only use 124
> to 30 hours of operating time.
>
> Just modernize it with the new modes that a newly licensed person can use.
> IE: 3 Modes CW, SSB, Digital.
> And like Field Day you can work them on each band and each mode.
>
> Same with Mults each band and mode to encourage people to try different bands
> and modes.
>
> Joe WB9SBD
>
> That would have been a BLAST
> Sig
> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
> Idle Tyme
> Idle-Tyme.com
> http://www.idle-tyme.com
>> On 11/4/2019 10:20 PM, John Geiger wrote:
>> How many rookie operators are showing up in the CW version of the Rookie
>> Roundup? That might give us a good indication of what the expect in the CW
>> SS in years to come.
>>
>> 73 John W5TD
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 9:41 PM AB2E Darrell <ab2e@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Pete,
>>> Good point about the new ops showing up.
>>> It's been 3 or 4 years since I operated SS CW more than just a couple
>>> hours.
>>> I noticed quite a few CKs from 00-18. Also quite a number of ops coming
>>> back to my CQ at between 17-21 WPM.
>>> While I like to typically operate at 30+wpm in contests, I try to slow
>>> down for the slower ops that came back.
>>> I think it will help them hang in there. Sometimes I just slowed down
>>> some, like to 24 or 25 so as to still challenge them and hopefully help
>>> improve their speed.
>>>
>>> There seems to be some attrition in the diehard 24hour high-speed
>>> operators, but perhaps that;s my imagination.
>>> I'm thinking back to the 90s and 80s when on Sunday afternoon a lot of
>>> operators had 1000+ QSO counts, only worked a few of those on Sun this
>>> year, and one of those was Multi.
>>>
>>> 73 Darrell AB2E
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com> on behalf of N4ZR <
>>> n4zr@comcast.net>
>>> Sent: Monday, November 4, 2019 5:44 PM
>>> To: cq-contest@contesting.com <cq-contest@contesting.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Scary
>>>
>>> The one I got from the N1MM site had over 10,000. I was surprised by
>>> how many people weren't in it. My theory, at least, is that there's a
>>> little new blood every year, and a good thing. Too many checks in the 50s.
>>>
>>> 73, Pete N4ZR
>>> Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
>>> at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
>>> spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
>>> For spots, please use your favorite
>>> "retail" DX cluster.
>>>
>>> On 11/4/2019 1:09 PM, Radio KØHB wrote:
>>>> I loaded a “call history” file into N1MM+ for this weekends SS CW.
>>>>
>>>> Out of over 500 contacts, just seven were NOT in that file. Five of
>>> them had checks from the last century.
>>>> 73, de Hans, KØHB
>>>> "Just a boy and his radio"™
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>
>>> [https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png
>>> ]<
>>> http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>>> Virus-free. www.avg.com<
>>> http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|
