CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 vs FT4 in the Contest

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 vs FT4 in the Contest
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2019 18:31:29 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 9/1/2019 2:54 PM, Edward Sawyer wrote:
I am reading with interest the discussion about the digi contest. Many people were repeating that FT8 was used more than FT4 to "pick up the casuals".

It doesn't appear that you've read K1JT's documentation on WSJT-X, which includes about a dozen different protocols for different propagation and different operating activities.

https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx-doc/wsjtx-main-2.1.0.html

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>