To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 vs FT4 in the Contest |
From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
Date: | Sun, 1 Sep 2019 18:31:29 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On 9/1/2019 2:54 PM, Edward Sawyer wrote: I am reading with interest the discussion about the digi contest. Many people were repeating that FT8 was used more than FT4 to "pick up the casuals". It doesn't appear that you've read K1JT's documentation on WSJT-X, which includes about a dozen different protocols for different propagation and different operating activities. https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx-doc/wsjtx-main-2.1.0.html 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a FTn Contest QSO Complete?, Bruce Horn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 vs FT4 in the Contest, Edward Sawyer |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] FT8 vs FT4 in the Contest, Edward Sawyer |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 vs FT4 in the Contest, Mark - N5OT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |