CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] FT4 - Robotic Contesting

To: Dave Hachadorian <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>, CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] FT4 - Robotic Contesting
From: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Reply-to: n2ic@arrl.net
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 12:44:31 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 05/03/2019 09:26 AM, Dave Hachadorian wrote:
I have done both FT4 and RTTY contesting. Let me compare them.

RTTY
Using a heavy-duty 1500 watt amplifier, I call CQ CONTEST.
A station comes back, automatically goes into N1MM's GRAB box, and I hit INSERT.

Only the strongest station is decoded when there are multiple callers, or the operator uses his/her skill to time their S&P call.

N1MM sends a bogus 599 plus the exchange.  The other station's exchange data gets filled automatically from a call history file.
I hit ENTER, and TU QRZ gets sent.
Repeat all above

FT4
I click ENABLE TX, and a CQ gets sent, using only a 100 watt exciter.
A station comes back, gives me a real signal report and exchange, and the

Multiple stations come back simultaneously and are decoded. An algorithm in WSJT-X picks one of them.

Do you really like the idea that your station, that you have been improving for years to be loud, can now be selected against by a K1JT algorithm that chooses the weakest, not the strongest calling station ?

73,
Steve, N2IC

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>