CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Top Ten Switching Layout Ideas?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Top Ten Switching Layout Ideas?
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 10:31:08 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 12/24/2017 6:45 PM, Mike Wetzel wrote:
I am reconfiguring my SO2R antenna switching using the Top Ten 1 x 6
switches (2) and 1 x 2 switches (6) in the classic configuration.

Hi Mike,

I suggest that you instead use 4O3A's new 8x2 unit. Not only is the cabling simpler, it's RF performance is FAR superior. I measured isolation greater than 100 dB between all combinations of ins and outs, and with all unused outputs un-terminated. His older 6x2 measures in the range of -75 dB, and the Array Solutions box it replaced was in the range of -53 dB.

You will NOT like what you see if you measure the RF path of the 1x2 box. I haven't measured the 1x6s, which I'm using to switch stubs on my high 80 and 40 dipoles, but based on what I saw with the much simpler 1x2s, I wouldn't dream of using them above 40M.

The 4O3A unit is quite flexible as to the control signal(s) that it can use. All I did to go from the SixPak to the 8x2 was wire the control lines to a DB15 connector that the 4O3A uses. The control method is selected by a DIP switch.

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>