Yup, just because it's cheaper, does NOT mean it's Junk!
The small Transmitter I bought, for the FM broadcast I bought in 1994.
For like 5 bucks.
It plays radio when I want to as described in my infamous E-Mail, and
99% of the time it's streaming audio from like Pandora all through my
property.
Still running strong! 20+ years later!
Joe WB9SBD
On 12/24/2017 4:06 PM, Tom Osborne wrote:
Been using the same old Radio Shack cordless headphones my wife bought me
about 10 years ago. Analog type with no latency in the audio.
Just set them on the charger base when not using them and they are always
ready to go. She paid $29.95 for them. Best $29.95 she ever spent on me!
:-)
They have big muffs that are real comfortable to wear. And the best part
is that I can take my hearing aids off and adjust the volume to where it is
comfortable without the 'aids. 73
Tom W7WHY
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 6:29 AM, Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net> wrote:
Don’t forget: quality always costs less in the long run.
What are the odds the cheapo unit posited has the Pin 1 problem?
How many cheap units do you go through before you decide to do what you
should have done in the first place? Which is, of course, to pony up for
quality… For those who asked about a “quality” unit, $200 is not too much.
73, kelly, ve4xt,
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|