I guess most people started at contest start and were done in 24
hours? I had very few hours to operate; I thought I'd get a
significant number of QSO's during the last couple hours. I heard
nothing on 20 meters or above and only a handful of stations on 40.
They were much weaker than Saturday night around 0500Z. I thought my
antenna had fallen down.
At least I got to make 30 QSO's. I've missed the last couple years
because I couldn't determine how or where to put an antenna at my new
QTH. I finally got a vertical put up.
73, Zack W9SZ
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Jim Stahl via CQ-Contest
<cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
> For all who stuck it out to the bitter end in SS, it is clear that it is time
> for a rules update for ARRL contests, specifically doing away with general
> rules 3.3 and 3.5:
>
>
> 3.3.An operator may not use more than one call sign from any given location
> during the contest period.
>
> 3.5.A transmitter used to contact one or more stations may not be
> subsequently used under any other call during the contest period, except for
> family stations where more than one call has been issued, and then only if
> the second call sign is used by a different operator. (The intent of this
> rule is to accommodate family members who must share a rig and to prohibit
> manufactured or artificial contacts.)
> ------------------------
>
> As many of you are aware, for many years I’ve been doing “Single Operator
> Multi Station” efforts in SS, typically operating from four different
> stations in an effort to turn SS into a 24 hour ratefest. Now that I’m a
> Florida snowbird, that has been reduced to two efforts, this year a QRP
> effort as K8MR with the KX3 from a waterfront parking area, and a LP effort
> with the K3 from the condo as W3USA.
>
> It was a lot more fun to be working people in the second effort from W3USA
> who I had previously worked from K8MR. I’m sure nobody was bothered that I
> gave them an extra QSO by using two stations.
>
> My take is that these rules were put in many years ago to prevent
> “manufactured” contacts by friends, fellow club members or whoever. In the
> days of paper logs that may have made sense. But with today’s log checking it
> is a lot easier to find suspicious manufactured contacts. Even though a
> person “ manufacturing” a few QSOs is not likely to send in a log of those
> QSOs.
>
> Some reasonable limits might be in order, such as a minimum off time from a
> previous call before it could be used again, or even not allowing any return
> to using a previous call. But if a few hundred people were to decide on
> Sunday afternoon (or whenever) to fire up their stations with a new call, and
> have fun running some good rates while giving the full time folks new people
> somebody to work, would anybody really mind?
>
>
> 73 - Jim K8MR
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<div id="DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br />
<table style="border-top: 1px solid #D3D4DE;">
<tr>
<td style="width: 55px; padding-top: 13px;"><a
href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon"
target="_blank"><img
src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif"
alt="" width="46" height="29" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;"
/></a></td>
<td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 12px; color: #41424e;
font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
line-height: 18px;">Virus-free. <a
href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link"
target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avast.com</a>
</td>
</tr>
</table><a href="#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1"
height="1"></a></div>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|