Igor, maybe you can share with us your technique to make sure that the other
party has copied (and logged!) you call correctly?
It's something like asking after QSO - "Did you copy and LOG my call as
UA9CDC?" :-)
Honestly, never heard anything like that from W2SC, N2NT, N6MJ, KL9A and other
guys who are usually top scorers...
And talking about myself - believe me - I never send my call as "BY2T" or even
"6Y5T". And I never even do a 40 WPM.
38 at most. :-)
Yuri
P.S. BTW it was RDXC UBN report that encouraged me to change my call from VA3UZ
to VE3DZ back in 2002...
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Igor
Sokolov
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:50 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Broken calls
Exactly.
Two way QSO only counts when both sides log call signs and exchange correctly.
This philosophy has been implemented in most of contests in Russia. Otherwise
when I hear that my corresponded got my call as UA9CBC instead of CDC there is
no incentive to spend time correcting him. I will get my points anyway. The
same is true about whatever exchange there is in a contest.
73, Igor UA9CDC
15.06.2017 21:58, NM5M via CQ-Contest пишет:
> Best way to slow some of these ops down is to implement scoring that requires
> both sides copy all the information correctly for the QSO to count.
>
> Don't the Russians already do that in their Contest?
>
> DE NM5M
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|