Irrespective of who created the cluster and for what, it does not fall under
the jurisdiction of contesting and its operators cannot be forced to shut it
down.
That much is true: whether it's sad, but true, I'll leave for individuals to
decide...
73, kelly, ve4xt,
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 24, 2017, at 19:49, Jamie WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net> wrote:
>
> exactly.....and if memory serves me right, Dick and a partner (K1EA was maybe
> involved?) started a company, Cerulean (I think) , and morphed the packet
> cluster into something law enforcement and public service agencies used.....
>
> -----Original Message----- From: James Cain
> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 1:54 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Cc: k0rc@citlink.net
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting explanation from CQWW blog
>
> See "Packet With a Purpose," by James D. Cain, K1TN, QST, August 1990, page
> 54.-- K1TN------*/"The clusters were created for DXing not contesting."/*
>
> This statement is absolutely, 100% wrong. The original Packet Cluster was
> designed for contesting. If you don't believe me, ask the designers of the
> original system.
> 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|