CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Disqualified callsigns - CQ WW SSB contest.

To: Ed K1EP <k1ep.list@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Disqualified callsigns - CQ WW SSB contest.
From: Charles Gallo <charlie@thegallos.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 11:43:38 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hey, I did it once, called P40w out of band (hi John). I did get an OO note the 
next week. I straight out blew it, and noticed about 10 seconds after the QSO. 
Oopps

--  
73 de KG2V
Charlie

> On Apr 13, 2017, at 10:27 PM, Ed K1EP <k1ep.list@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Many stations, including even the current CQWW Contest director, have at
> times worked stations outside the US bands. I have been at several DX
> locations in contests where US stations have called me while I was below
> the US band working Eu. I gave up trying to explain things, I just work
> them. None of the stations i worked in CQWW SSB 2016 were DQd. I have a
> list of the US stations from this year that I worked outside the band. But
> you can get DQd for getting spotted too many times by someone.
> 
> On Apr 13, 2017 9:02 PM, "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com> wrote:
> 
> Agreed.  They violated FCC rules which I believe the rules state is a DQ?
> At the very least we all agree to abide by them.
> 
> Operating outside the band is about as big a violation you can get.
> 
> It is defined under unsportsmanlike conduct.
> 
> *A. Unsportsmanlike Conduct:*Examples of unsportsmanlike conduct include,
> but are not limited to:
> 
> 1. Arranging or confirming any contacts during or after the contest by
>   use of ANY non-amateur radio means such as telephones, Internet,
>   instant messaging, chat rooms, VoIP, email, social media or web sites.
> 2. Transmissions by the entrant on frequencies outside of license
>   limitations.
> 3. Changing times in the log to meet band change or off time rules.
> 4. Taking credit for excessive unverifiable QSOs or unverifiable
>   multipliers.
> 5. Signals with excessive bandwidth (e.g., splatter, clicks) or
>   harmonics on other bands.
> 6. Running stations not identifying in a timely manner (i.e., 1 minute).
> 
> 
> The reason that such a small penalty was given was because of the
> extensiveness and stations that did it.  How many of those logs were
> massaged to indicate that the qso took place inside the USA band when it
> did not or removed completely?  Was this checked? How many nils did the guy
> that was outside the USA band get from USA entrants.  How many very known
> USA stations did this?  A friend of mine said he heard many big time
> Multi's working this station.
> 
> 
> Not following the 10 minute rule is detailed under
> 
> *IX. GENERAL RULES FOR ALL ENTRANTS:*
> 
> 1. Entrants must operate within the limits of their chosen category
>   when performing any activity that could impact their submitted score.
> 
> Please direct me to the paragraph in the rules where I can learn how to
> break the 10 minute rule and then X-qso out those "illegal" contacts to be
> whole again.
> 
> Time and time again stations are given a pass, why?  Is it any wonder
> people continue to push the rules.  Self spotting is a bigger offense than
> operating outside your band?
> 
> Contesting appears to be a culture of looking the other way and as I learn
> more it has been happening for a very long time.  We would like to think we
> are the best.  If so then abide by the rules, especially our license rules.
> 
> A penalty of removing the qsos is less than a slap on the wrist. Sorry CQ.
> You had a chance to send a strong message.  The one you just sent was
> indeed there is plenty of USA/NA bias.
> 
> W0MU
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 4/13/2017 8:03 AM, Steve London wrote:
>> 
>> One of those DQed is a YB who made about 50 QSO's, and may not even
>> understand what self-spotting is. But the worst that happens to a USA
>> contester, who knowingly or carelessly works stations out-of-band, is that
>> he/she loses the QSO and gets a slap on the wrist.
>> 
>> That's simply a message to USA contesters that, in the future, they have
>> nothing to lose (except possibly the QSO) if they work stations out-of-band.
>> 
>> 
>> Steve, N2IC
>> 
>> 
>> On 04/13/2017 03:50 AM, w5ov@w5ov.com wrote:
>> 
>> Out of band:  Most out of band qsos were disallowed for those who were out
>>> of band for the QSO in question – this was applied globally.  Often, one
>>> party is legal on a frequency, another is not.  Those who operated out of
>>> their band were penalized and given no credit for those qsos / mults. No
>>> one was DQed for this offense regardless of country / zone etc.  Some who
>>> exhibited excessive carelessness about this matter were given formal
>>> warnings.
>> 
>> Along with the other absurdities, the thought that USA / VE was given any
>>> favor is again completely without any merit.
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>